top of page

Weekly Newsletter

Dear Subscriber:
Here’s our latest newsletter highlighting apparently cheap stocks generated from basic value screens (low p/e, ev/ebitda, debt, etc.), which don’t meet our investment standards - and our reasoning.
Perhaps this could help you avoid a few ‘value traps’ or stocks that aren’t sufficiently attractive compared to the opportunities available today.
These lists are a result of our secondary screening procedure; and is – by nature – a cookie-cutter approach. We do not claim our exclusions are foolproof by any means (some of these stocks could do very well). But we are confident our remaining stocks form a materially higher quality group – and in investing, you only need to reason correctly on what you invest in.
We are happy to hear from you on specific stocks you disagree with, and your reasoning - send us an e-mail.
For reports of stock ideas that pass our quantitative and qualitative standards, join risk-free with a 7-day free trial here:

So, here’s our latest list of 30 stocks that look cheap - but don’t meet our investment standards:

Comments


Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page